Tag the topical areas, methods, and populations you cover. For each, pick a level:
Roll-up: tagging a whole pile (e.g. all of "Extended Reality (XR)") counts as every sub-pile under it. The cap counters on the right show how many sub-piles you've covered.
Caps: R is hard-capped at 10 sub-piles (the strong signal is intentionally scarce). K is soft-capped at ~30.
Tips: greyed words in parentheses are example author keywords (searchable, not selectable); use facet pills to focus on one facet; selections appear in the right-hand cart with a copyable profile.
Build a reviewer profile for yourself, as if signing up for CHI 2027. Tag across Domain / Method / Users using R (Recently published) and K (Knowledgeable) — see the blue panel above for what each level means.
The R/K distinction is trying to capture three things at once: expertise, recency, and willingness to review. We want to know whether that fusion communicates clearly to you, or whether you read it as just one of the three.
While tagging, please notice — as a reviewer, not as an author:
Then move on to paper.html and tag two of your own papers. Capture everything in the feedback form linked in the email.
Time budget: ~7 minutes for this tool. Don't try to be exhaustive.